Skip to content

FULL-FUNNEL MANAGEMENT · FLAGSHIP

Compare Your Channels. Move Every Dollar to What Wins.

For founders running spend across Google, Meta, and Microsoft who still can’t compare them. One team runs your ads and the analytics beneath them, every channel measured the same way, so you finally see where the next dollar earns the most. Get clarity on how things stand.

The three channels sit on one scorecard with their cost per lead and ROAS. Budget flows into each channel as a stream. Move budget with the sliders: the blended cost per lead and ROAS update, and the winner is the channel with the lowest cost per lead and the highest ROAS.

One dashboard · every channel, measured the same way

One scorecard
CHANNELCOST / LEADROASBudget
Google$442.8x
Meta$393.4x
Microsoft ↑ scale$274.6x
BlendedExample

COST / LEAD$38.84

ROAS3.25x

  • Google Partner
  • Meta Business Partner
  • Clutch
  • Upwork Top 1%

THE REAL PROBLEM

You can’t compare channels you measure differently

Most companies run Google through one vendor, Meta through another, and Microsoft as a forgotten import, each with its own tracking. So the numbers never reconcile, and budget gets allocated on gut.

  1. The numbers never agree

    Each channel reports differently and none matches the bank. There’s no single read on what actually drives revenue.

  2. You can’t tell which channel wins

    Three dashboards, three definitions of a conversion. So you can’t say where the next dollar should go.

  3. Budget is stuck in silos

    Spend is locked per channel and per vendor, instead of flowing to whatever is winning this month.

  4. Everyone blames everyone

    The media buyer blames the pixel, the analyst blames the buyer, and the vendors blame each other.

OUR APPROACH

We unify the measurement first. Then the comparison is real.

The 3-Pillar Method™ runs across your whole stack, not one channel at a time.

  1. One Measurement Layer

    Server-side, CAPI, UET, offline and CRM imports, one BigQuery warehouse, so Google, Meta, and Microsoft are all measured the same way. This is what makes them comparable.

    Pillar 1 · The unified wedge

  2. Channel Structure

    Each channel rebuilt for its own strengths, not lazy-imported, and structured for profitable, controllable scaling.

    Pillar 2 · Built per channel

  3. Creative & Message

    Creative and message-market match tuned per platform, because what wins on Meta isn’t what wins on Search.

    Pillar 3 · Per platform

WHAT’S INCLUDED

The whole stack, run as one engine

  • One unified measurement layer across Google, Meta & Microsoft
  • One Data Studio dashboard: CPL & ROAS comparable across channels
  • Full-funnel coverage: prospecting, nurture, capture & cross-channel retargeting
  • Server-side, CAPI, UET, Enhanced Conversions & offline/CRM imports
  • Cross-channel budget allocation toward whatever wins
  • Enterprise decision-intelligence layer (attribution + predictive)
  • Event Map — every conversion, every channel, documented
  • Quarterly strategy & growth reviews

Why each channel earns its place

  • Google: measured on revenue, not clicks. Every dollar tracked end to end across Search, Shopping, and PMax.

  • Meta: fed clean server-side data so it optimizes on real conversions post-iOS, paired with creative that converts.

  • Microsoft: run first-class, not a leftover import, with LinkedIn company, industry, and job-function targeting for cheaper, higher-intent reach.

What You Get

Compare, allocate, scale

  • One source of truth

    Every channel measured the same way, with cost per lead and ROAS side by side, reconciled with the bank.

  • Budget that follows winners

    Move spend toward whatever is winning this month, across channels, because for the first time you can actually see it.

  • One engine, not three silos

    One accountable team running the ads, the tracking, and the numbers, with no finger-pointing.

Why a Partner

nn.partners vs the typical multi-vendor setup

The realistic alternative is a patchwork of single-channel vendors plus a separate analytics resource. Here’s the difference.

  • Scope

    nn.partners

    ✓ All channels AND analytics, one roof

    Typical multi-vendor setup
    ✗ One vendor per channel; tracking is your problem
  • Measurement

    nn.partners

    ✓ One unified layer across Google/Meta/Microsoft

    Typical multi-vendor setup
    ✗ A different setup per channel, numbers never reconcile
  • Comparison

    nn.partners

    ✓ CPL & ROAS comparable across channels

    Typical multi-vendor setup
    ✗ Siloed screenshots you can’t compare
  • Budgeting

    nn.partners

    ✓ Move budget to whatever wins

    Typical multi-vendor setup
    ✗ Stuck in silos, allocated on gut
  • Method

    nn.partners

    ✓ One 3-Pillar Method™ across the stack

    Typical multi-vendor setup
    ✗ Set-and-forget tweaks, no shared method
  • Accountability

    nn.partners

    ✓ One team, one source of truth

    Typical multi-vendor setup
    ✗ Vendors blaming each other
  • Access

    nn.partners

    ✓ The strategist who owns the whole stack

    Typical multi-vendor setup
    ✗ Three junior reps across three vendors
  • $10M+managed across channels
  • 1source of truth, every channelunified measurement
  • 7 figuresadded for clients in 2024
Nik Vdovenko, founder of nn.partners

Who Runs Your Stack

One team owns the ads, the tracking, and the numbers

No more a media buyer who blames the pixel, an analyst who blames the buyer, and three vendors who blame each other. Your whole stack is run by Nik Vdovenko, founder, with 9 years and $10M+ in managed spend. You work directly with the strategist who owns every channel and the measurement beneath them.

  • One teamAll channels, no finger-pointing
  • Founder-ledSenior attention, no handoff
  • 9 yrs · $10M+Across channels & continents
  • Request auditGet clarity before you commit

How It Works

Get clarity before you commit

  1. Request Full-Funnel Audit

    We review every channel, the tracking beneath them, and where attribution and budget are leaking across the funnel. No obligation.

  2. Build & Unify

    We unify the measurement layer, rebuild each channel for its strengths, and connect it all into one dashboard. Request an audit; get clarity on how things stand and areas of growth.

  3. Manage & Allocate

    Ongoing management across the funnel, moving budget to whatever wins, with one source of truth you can trust.

FAQ

Questions multi-channel founders ask

Per-channel agencies each optimize their own silo and none of them see the whole picture, so budget gets defended instead of allocated. We run Google, Meta and Microsoft off one tracking setup and one P&L view, so money moves to wherever it’s actually working.

Every platform reports conversions differently and double-counts. We feed them all from one server-side source tied to real revenue, so a lead from Meta and a lead from Google mean the same thing. Then you can compare them honestly.

Google, Meta and Microsoft as the core, plus YouTube where it fits. We start with the channels your buyers actually use, not a checklist.

By what closes, not by what platforms claim. Once everything reconciles to revenue, the answer is usually obvious, and we shift spend toward the channels and campaigns carrying their weight.

One view across every channel that ties spend to closed revenue, not platform-reported conversions. You stop reconciling three dashboards that disagree and start making decisions.

It can, or it can extend one. We’re a small senior team plus specialists, so you get the strategy and the hands without the headcount. Plenty of clients keep us as their whole paid-media function.

Tracking and structure get fixed in the first weeks, and that alone usually surfaces wasted spend fast. The compounding gains come over the following months as better data feeds better decisions.

It scales with how many channels you run, so we price it after the audit. Request an ads audit; get clarity on how things stand and areas of growth.

Let’s grow together

One team. Every channel. One source of truth.

Your ads and analytics across Google, Meta, and Microsoft, measured the same way, so you can finally compare them and put every dollar where it wins.

  • 3Channels, one team
  • $10M+Ad spend managed
  • 9 yrsPaid media & analytics
  • RequestFull-funnel audit

Book your data audit

Your account Step 1 of 2

Tell us a bit about your account. We’ll come prepared with a real look at what’s leaking.

Monthly ad spend
Platforms that you use Optional

48-hour turnaround after getting access.

Book a strategy call directly